![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
August 3, 2005 Steven Galson, M.D. Dear Dr. Galson: At our recent joint workshop, FDA itself acknowledged that not all thyroxine brands have been determined to be interchangeable. FDA further pledged to cooperate in heightening public awareness of this fact. As you are aware, our societies—representing this country’s clinical experts in thyroid disease management—also still have serious concerns about the lax bioequivalence standard that has been employed to approve certain thyroxine products as therapeutically equivalent. In light of these facts, we find FDA’s action to remove the warning regarding dose retitration after switching brands to be inconsistent and irresponsible. It appears to neglect the welfare of 13 million Americans who depend on precise dosing of their thyroxine, which is widely recognized to be a narrow therapeutic index drug. Consequently, we ask that you defer this action until there has been an opportunity to explain the agency’s reasoning and consider our serious concerns. We will be calling you soon to set up a meeting to discuss this important issue, and to explore the other items that we discussed pursuing at our joint workshop. Yours truly,
cc: Lester M. Crawford, DVM, PhD, Commissioner |
|||||||||
See related articles on Bioequivalence of Levothyroxine






