support thyroid research

Clinical Thyroidology

Why Do Patients with Subclinical Hypothyroidism Get Overtreated?

Stephen W. Spaulding

Clinical Thyroidology

Taylor PN, Iqbal A, Minassian C, Sayers A, Draman MS, Greenwood R, Hamilton W, Okosieme O, Panicker V, Thomas SL, Dayan C. Falling threshold for treatment of borderline elevated thyrotropin levels—balancing benefits and risks: evidence from a large community-based study. JAMA Intern Med. October 7, 2013 [Epub ahead of print]/ doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11312.

Full Text PDF Full Text PDF

SUMMARY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Background

There is growing concern about patients with subclinical hypothyroidism receiving too much L-T4, a problem found both in specialty and in primary care settings. Too much circulating thyroid hormone can increase the risk of atrial fibrillation and bone fragility, especially in the elderly. For patients who have a normal free T4 level and whose TSH is above the upper limit of normal yet below 10 mU/L, the American Thyroid Association recommends considering treatment if the patient has symptoms suggestive of hypothyroidism, a positive anti-TPO titer, or evidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or associated risk factors for these diseases (1). British guidelines indicate that if screening thyroid-function tests have been performed for nonspecific symptoms in a normal healthy adult and the TSH is between 4 and 10 mU/L but the FT4 is normal, L-T4 is not recommended as routine therapy. However, repeat thyroid-function testing should be done in 3 to 6 months, after excluding nonthyroidal illness and drug interference (2). If the second test results are similar to the first, and if the anti-TPO titer is normal, a repeat measurement of TSH every 3 years is all that is required (2). In the United Kingdom, primary care physicians take care of most patients receiving L-T4 for hypothyroidism. A computerized thyroid disease register assists physicians in keeping track of all the patients with hypothyroidism receiving L-T4 and to ensure that physicians obtain thyroid-function tests on these patients every 12 months. The current study assessed how instituting these practice targets influenced L-T4 prescribing behavior and whether this policy may have had unintended consequences.

Methods

About 52,000 patients given an initial L-T4 prescription within 90 days of a TSH determination were identified in the General Practice Research Database between 2001 and 2009, after excluding patients known to be taking thyroid-altering medications, those receiving L-T4 for pregnancy, and those with a known history of hyperthyroidism, pituitary disease or thyroid surgery. Pretreatment TSH levels, L-T4 prescriptions, and subsequent TSH levels were analyzed every 6 months for up to 5 years (if more than one determination had been obtained within a 6-month period, the most recent value was used). An "interpretable" free T4 determination was available in about 35,000 cases at the time of the initial prescription of L-T4, while in 21,000 cases a free T4 level was available at the end of a patient’s study. Unfortunately, no "interpretable" anti-TPO data were available. Other symptoms, clinical findings, diagnoses, clinic appointments, tests, and procedures were reviewed for the 3 months prior to initiating treatment with L-T4, and, along with age and sex, were factored into the analyses. No information concerning mortality was provided. Logistic-regression analysis was used to assess the odds of a patient being given an L-T4 prescription for a TSH of 10 mU/L or less. The odds of suppressed TSH developing at 5 years were also assessed by univariable logistic regression.

Results

The median TSH for which a new patient received L-T4 fell steadily over the study period, from 8.7 mU/L in 2001 to 7.9 mU/L in 2009. After adjusting for multiple variables, the odds ratio for as of a patient receiving L-T4 for a TSH of 10 mU/L or less was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.42; P<0.001) in 2009 as compared with 2001. In 2001, 42% of patients had a TSH above 10 mU/L, whereas in 2009, only 36% had a TSH above 10 mU/L (P<0.001). Of the patients whose initial TSH was between 4 and 10 mU/L, about 20,000 had an interpretable free T4 before L-T4 treatment was started. Strikingly, 83% of them had a normal free T4. True, those who were given L-T4 despite a normal free T4 were more likely to be older and to have had pretreatment cardiovascular risk factors, but the majority (11,000) did not have a history of hypertension, diabetes, or elevated lipids and had no symptoms consistent with hypothyroidism. After 6 to 12 months of treatment, 2.7% of patients had a suppressed TSH (<0.1 mU/L), whereas after 54 to 60 months of treatment, the fraction with a frankly suppressed TSH had more than doubled (5.8%). Furthermore, the fraction of patients with a TSH between 0.1 mU/L and 0.5 mU/L rose from 6.3% after 6 to 12 months to 10.2% after 54 to 60 months of treatment. Patients who noted fatigue or depression before the initial prescription of L-T4 were significantly more likely to have a suppressed TSH at 5 years, as were women whose initial TSH was either under 4 mU/L or over 10 mU/L. Although those with cardiac risk factors were less likely to have a suppressed TSH level, more than 10% of those with cardiac risk factors did have a low TSH level. The risk of being given a new prescription for a TSH between 4 and 10 mU/L was greatest in those 80 to 100 years old.

Conclusions

In the United Kingdom, the fraction of patients with marginal degrees of hypothyroidism treated with L-T4 increased progressively between 2001 and 2009, apparently associated with the institution of new targets for general practitioners. The risk for a patient with a suppressed TSH or a TSH below the lower limit of normal was substantially greater after 5 years’ treatment than after only 6 to 12 month’s treatment.

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY • • • • • •

The risks associated with having an elevated T4/free T4 appear to exceed the risks of having a TSH between 4 and 10 mU/L. Older patients are at particular risk for overtreatment, since their upper limit of normal for the level of TSH is slightly higher than that in younger patients (3). A review of records on 3900 community-dwelling apparently euthyroid Caucasian Australian men over 70 years of age found that those whose free T4 was normal but in the highest quartile were 20% more likely to have died (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI,1.02 to 1.39) over 6 years of follow-up (4). In contrast, there was no altered risk of mortality associated with any quartile of TSH within the normal range (4).

What leads to overtreatment of patients with hypothyroidism? Patients who reported tiredness and depression at the initiation of treatment in this study were significantly more likely to have a suppressed TSH at the end of the study, perhaps because they requested extra L-T4 to make them feel less lethargic or less depressed. (This may reflect U.K. guidelines on the use of thyroid-function tests, which states "The primary target of thyroxine replacement is to make the patient feel well and to achieve a serum TSH that is in the reference range. … The corresponding free T4 will be within or slightly above its reference range" (2). In other cases, a fall in a patient’s TSH level, a patient’s failure to get a scheduled repeat TSH test, or some change in the patient’s medications, co-morbid conditions, or diet that have reduced a patient’s L-T4 requirement may have escaped the physician’s notice. Rarely, a patient with hypothyroidism can turn to hyperthyroidism because of a change in the activity of thyroid-stimulating antibodies versus the activity of thyroid-blocking antibodies (5). Similarly, a new hot nodule can turn hypothyroidism to hyperthyroidism. There is also evidence that the amount of L-T4 a patient requires correlates with lean body mass, which tends to decrease with age. Interestingly, almost 10% of the patients were no longer taking L-T4 at the end of the study period. In one third of the patients with a TSH between 4 and 10 mU/L, only that single determination had been obtained before L-T4 was given. Thus some of the patients may actually have had thyroid-function abnormalities, reflecting nonthyroidal illness. Furthermore, it is not unusual for a slightly elevated TSH level in an elderly patient to spontaneously normalize (6). On the other hand, some patients may have stopped taking L-T4 and begun taking another form of thyroid hormone obtained online, such as a desiccated thyroid preparation.

Patients who may have had a TSH between 4 and 10 mU/L, but who did not receive a prescription for L-T4 were not included in this study. The absence of anti-TPO data also weakens the interpretation of the data. Furthermore, several different TSH assays were being used during the study, and simply combining the results is not ideal, since some third-generation TSH assays can have a steeper TSH dose–response slope than others (3). More problematic, different free T4 assays were being used: the consistency and reliability of different T4 analog methods can be quite uneven, and results may not correlate well those obtained by dialysis (7). Nonetheless, until a large well-controlled, prospective, randomized trial of L-T4 treatment of patients with subclinical hypothyroidism that includes a wide range of ages and TSH levels is performed, the practitioner needs to be wary of overtreatment with L-T4.

References

  1. Garber JR, Cobin RH, Gharib H, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Thyroid 2012;22:1200-35. Epub November 6, 2012. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2012.0205. [Erratum, Thyroid 2013;23:129.]
  2. Association for Clinical Biochemistry, British Thyroid Association, British Thyroid Foundation. UK guidelines for the use of thyroid function tests. http://www.british-thyroid-association.org/info-for-patients/Docs/TFT_guideline_final_version_July_2006.pdf
  3. Spaulding SW. Using age-specific upper limits for normal TSH slightly reduces the incidence of subclinical hypothyroidism in the elderly. Clin Thyroidol 2012;24(8):7-9. thyroid.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/…/clinthy_v248_7_9.pdf
  4. Yeap BB, Alfonso H, Hankey GJ, et al. Higher free thyroxine levels are associated with all-cause mortality in euthyroid older men: the Health In Men Study. Eur J Endocrinol 2013;169:401-8.
  5. McLachlan SM, Rapoport B. Thyrotropin-blocking autoantibodies and thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies: potential mechanisms involved in the pendulum swinging from hypothyroidism to hyperthyroidism or vice versa. Thyroid 2013;23:14-24. doi:10.1089/thy.2012.0374
  6. Somwaru LL, Rariy CM, Arnold AM, Cappola AR. The natural history of subclinical hypothyroidism in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:1962-9.
  7. Thienpont LM, Van Uytfanghe K, Poppe K, Velkeniers B. Determination of free thyroid hormones. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;27:689-700. Epub June 25, 2013.

CLINICAL THYROIDOLOGY • DECEMBER 2013 VOLUME 25 • ISSUE 12 • © 2013